4 ms·
That's not the case. And if it were, it still wouldn't matter because the AGPLv3 source would have granted you a license to that too being a copyright license.
by monocasa 4y ago
That's not the case.
And if it were, it still wouldn't matter because the AGPLv3 source would have granted you a license to that too being a copyright license.
- tingletech 4y agoAGPLv3 allows one to add trademark terms that, when violated, revoke the copyright license.
- cmeacham98 4y agoLink to where Signal added these terms? You've posted a variant of this claim several times on this post but as far as I can see Signal-Desktop is licensed under a pure AGPLv3 which definitely does not have such terms.
- galgalesh 4y agoThis is not correct. The trademark doesn't affect the copyright but you need both in order to publish binaries with the original name and logo in a store. You need a copyright license to use the binary. You need a trademark license to use the trademark. See the firefox -> iceweasel kerfuffle