4 ms·

I think describing it this way misses an important implication. It's not a singular third tactic - it's that AIs generally lack the ability to recognize actions

I think describing it this way misses an important implication. It's not a singular third tactic - it's that AIs generally lack the ability to recognize actions as being outside or against their training, meaning you can manipulate their internal state by acting in ways they were not trained to expect. Or, to put it another way, where humans recognize trolling, AIs will take trolling seriously forever. This is an extension of the problem with ML in general, which is that ML struggles to recognize when its judging a situation that is outside its training. In those circumstances they have a high chance to emit bad judgements with high confidence.

gcanyon 4y ago
Well, yes, that's kind of the conclusion I was going for. To generalize further, it's possible that a rock-paper-scissors-lizard-spock situation could result, with an arbitrary length of A beats B, B beats C, C beats D....ZZZ beats A. Then we potentially look for something akin to a universal Turing machine: an algorithm that is capable of beating any other algorithm no matter what their strategy, perhaps(?) by simulating the algorithm that beats them.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]