I’ve found hardware-oriented businesses to be woefully behind the times when it comes to software engineering processes. This article is no exception. Although

I’ve found hardware-oriented businesses to be woefully behind the times when it comes to software engineering processes. This article is no exception. Although I agree with his overall framing, once you get to the details, James is describing a document-oriented approach that was in vogue about 25 years ago, and has long since been superseded. What replaced it? Agile. Wait, don’t throw rotten vegetables—I’m not talking about the overwrought excuse for micromanagement people call “Agile” nowadays, but the truly innovative thinking that was happening in the late 90s and early 2000s. Stuff like the Poppendiecks’ Lean Software Development (based on their experience at 3M) and Cockburn’s Agile Software Development (based on research he originally conducted at IBM). And of course Beck’s Extreme Programming, based in part on his work with Ward Cunningham at Tektronix. These processes and thinking started with the reality that it’s impossible, given a large, complex system, to correctly specify everything in advance. They recognized that documents are a particularly poor communication medium—one that’s time-consuming to create and consume, and very difficult to do in a way that isn’t misunderstood. Instead, they focused on people as more important than process, and adaptation as more important than prediction. Traditional SDLCs fell by the wayside, and for good reason: they didn’t work well. Their document-heavy approach resulted in poor visibility for management and software that met the spec but not customer needs. I talk about this more in my book. The first chapter talks about how and why Agile supplanted traditional processes. It’s free online (along with a lot of other material) here: https://www.jamesshore.com/v2/books/aoad2/what_is_agile https://www.jamesshore.com/v2/books/aoad2/what_is_agile