I think the ball is in your court when launching an ad hominem attack (before we even get to the question of whether it is relevant) It seems like that should

I think the ball is in your court when launching an ad hominem attack (before we even get to the question of whether it is relevant) It seems like that should be easy enough to provide some evidence for, if it’s true. https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=meditating%20collison%20stripe https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=meditating%20collison%... Gives nothing at a glance. Do you have anything?