5 ms·
> It's not "Zig spam" to ask (...) It is Zig spam, not because of the discussion or the question or the topic of the time of day. It's Zig spam because it's ye
by simplotek 4y ago
> It's not "Zig spam" to ask (...)
It is Zig spam, not because of the discussion or the question or the topic of the time of day. It's Zig spam because it's yet another Zig post among the barrage of Zig posts desperately shoe-horning offtopic gratuitous references to Zig. It's tiring and adds nothing to any discussion.
If you feel that strongly about the need to promote Zig, submit discussions. Please don't spam each and any top submission with these gratuitous references.
- kitd 4y agoIt's not off-topic though. D has the facility to compile C projects, as has Zig. OP asked a genuine question about whether Walter Bright was able to compare experiences.
- cxr 4y agoPlease don't blow past the comments already addressing your complaint. What I responded to was a comment from D's own creator who himself directly mentioned Zig. I didn't shoe-horn shit. I've been waiting a long time for a hit on Corncob TV. If you're upset about Zig mentioned here, your quarrel is not with me, the person who spent over half the words in their comment bringing it back to the original topic by linking to a useful talk; your quarrel is with, if anyone, the original questioner who got Walter to comment on Zig. (And even then, your ire would be tenuous at best, for the reasons already mentioned.) I also cannot "feel that strongly about the need to promote Zig"—because I am not promoting Zig. As I have already said, D is closer to my tribe than Zig is.