3 ms·
the bot simply issued another request, seems obvious to me.
by throwaway64 15y ago
the bot simply issued another request, seems obvious to me.
- regularfry 15y agoA bot that would repeatedly issue notices against the same material would not be one I would be legally confident in, if I were in Universal's shoes. After all, if the material comes back after the first take-down, it means that someone has made a legally binding declaration that the original claim was mistaken. If it did end up in front of a judge, I can't see a blind repetition having helped Universal's case.
- throwaway64 15y agoI dont think such flippant disregard for procedure would be surprising from them