4 ms·
Kind of odd, it was announced as "Amber.js": http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/ http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/
by murz 15y ago
Kind of odd, it was announced as "Amber.js":
http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/ http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/08/announcing-amber-js/
- untog 15y agoI'm wondering if there was some kind of copyright/trademark issue at play here.
- wycats 15y agoNope. We just didn't feel good about the naming conflict. See http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/12/amber-js-formerly-sproutcore-2-0-is-now-ember-js/ http://yehudakatz.com/2011/12/12/amber-js-formerly-sproutcor...
- pasbesoin 15y agoIt's nice to know that some people, even when they have a lot of clout, still choose to play nice. Classy. :-) (Purely in my personal and unweighty (as it should be) opinion.)
- chc 15y agoProbably just concern over confusion with Amber, a JS implementation of Smalltalk.
- dwynings 15y agohttp://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3335916 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3335916
- murz 15y agoThanks, I missed that. It's interesting that they opted to go against the feedback they received from the HN majority :P