3 ms·
> I think letting people do this is awesome. I think standardizing on it would be a huge mistake. There is a hidden issue with not standardizing. Most people e
by pbalau 4y ago
> I think letting people do this is awesome. I think standardizing on it would be a huge mistake.
There is a hidden issue with not standardizing. Most people either don't care about local vs container (matching prod) development OR are terrible not equipped to make an informed choice. Thus, as a devops, I have to support both methods. This is a huge drain on my resources, especially since devopsing is just part of what I need to do.
The root cause of this is the myth that all software engineers will understand source control, will understand databases, will understand how systems interact with each other and on top of it, will understand the business so they can actually do the work required. This is how you end up with "it works on my machine". This is how you end up with "but it works in repl, therefore your prod environment is broken".
Standardizing doesn't mean this is the only way of doing things. It means, this is the standard way of doing things and if you get stuck, you get support. It means this is the way we consider to be most efficient of doing this stuff. You are still free to do things your way if you chose to, but if you get stuck, it's on you to get unstuck.
- taeric 4y agoI don't view that as a hidden issue. I view that as the cost. And agreed that conforming to what others are doing will, by definition, get you more support. I just think there is hidden value in that diversity. It sucks, as it can't be forced/codified. I will further agree that too many will chase the "long game" of "if we support diverse environments, we will have a more robust product," at the expense of short term health. And often that is a false dichotomy, in that often the best long term choice for a team is also the best short term tradeoff. Surviving is important.