The article is typical vomitus from today's partisan infants masquerading as journalists. To think that Musk can do any worse than a gaggle of self-important c

The article is typical vomitus from today's partisan infants masquerading as journalists. To think that Musk can do any worse than a gaggle of self-important c-suites with nanny complexes is laughable. Twitter has been hemorrhaging money. The company was poorly managed and only posted profits for 2 out of the last 10 years losing billions of dollars. They are way over-staffed, infected with ideology, and toxic to the point of contempt for all who do not share their world-view. That's unhealthy, and in the context of a free & open platform, a terminal trajectory. Obviously the acquisition is a risky play, but that's the point. No risk. No reward. And risk-taking is not out of character for Musk, or any entrepreneur like him. It is also Musk's money and all the risk is on him. Who cares what he does with it? ...unless you were happy with the level of censorship and control (power) that the self-important c-suite activists spun up, then I can understand why the author is so frazzled. The author's fourth paragraph is telling and reveals much about his state of mind. It is long on assumption, seen through a dirty lens of unconscious incompetence. I may bookmark the article, because should Musk succeed, which is likely given his unique brand of leadership, it will be the "funniest thing that’s ever happened." And if Musk fails, and twitter is forced to shutdown, then the world sheds one of the most contentious online cesspools to have ever existed.