2 ms·
Let's say he was giving 500,000GBP. 10% Great right? You have just given folks incentive to plant problems and reap the reward. You might say, they can au
by segmondy 4y ago
Let's say he was giving 500,000GBP. 10%
Great right? You have just given folks incentive to plant problems and reap the reward. You might say, they can audit and if you caused the problem, you don't get the reward. Great! Now, let's collude with another team mate, I cause they problem, they fix it, we split the rewards.
Once you give monetary incentive, folks start figuring out ways to game it.
There was an agreement on how much he was paid, the company paid that. Doesn't matter if he saved 5M in profits or not. What if he had failed? Or what if he was the reason the pricing import failed? Would it be okay for the company to penalize him by clawing back some of the money he had been paid in the past?
- actionablefiber 4y ago> Great right? You have just given folks incentive to plant problems and reap the reward. "Just given"? Doesn't this incentive already exist in the world with or without direct cash bounties for fixing problems?
- roflyear 4y agoInversely, next time that they asked me to fix the site during such a situation, I would pretend like I didn't see the alert.
- jnsaff2 4y agojeez. really? the COMPANY was run really shittily already, there was absolutely no effing reason to plant anything. all the people tried to make the company better, for shitty effing pay. have you ever seen a world where people take some kind of pride in their work? want to have a positive impact? I think giving 25 pounds was strictly worse than not giving anything at all. This was an insult.
- DontchaKnowit 4y agoYeah my take on this is that the only appropriate response is a thank you from top level leadership and serious consideration of your heroics when it comes time for salary adjustment. A thank you without a gift is way less insulting than a thank you with a paltry or trivial gift.