3 ms·
On the same website, another blog post [1] compares JPEG XL with other formats. [1] https://cloudinary.com/blog/time_for_next_gen_codecs_to_dethrone_jpeg https
by conaclos 4y ago
On the same website, another blog post [1] compares JPEG XL with other formats.
[1] https://cloudinary.com/blog/time_for_next_gen_codecs_to_dethrone_jpeg https://cloudinary.com/blog/time_for_next_gen_codecs_to_deth...
- Lockal 4y agoBe careful with this website. Cloudinary is a developer of JPEG XL, is an affiliated party, so there is absolutely no reason to expect a fair comparison. Instead visit https://storage.googleapis.com/demos.webmproject.org/webp/cmp/2022_10_04/index.html#white-dune-mui-ne*1:1&AVIF-AOM=t&JXL=t&subset1 https://storage.googleapis.com/demos.webmproject.org/webp/cm... and you will see that JPEG XL has color fringing and ringing artifacts.
- account42 4y agoThere is some irony on calling out benchmarks from an affiliated party and then linking to benchmarks from an affiliated party of the competing format. > The source images were stripped of any metadata, EXIF, XMP, color profile etc. including the gAMA PNG chunk. Just so happens that cjxl correctly supports PNG color profile/gamma data while cwebp doesn't.
- Lockal 4y agoI'm not suggesting to look at the "benchmark" part of this page. Given that the creators of formats can approximate the result to synthetic metrics for as long as they want, these metrics are secondary to individual perception. Personally, I would have easily sacrificed SSIM just to avoid seeing the green sand on the border of the blue and yellow areas.