4 ms·
That the terms were agreed to and the sabotage (sorry, anti-tampering) premeditated does not make this non-malicious. A contract may shield them legally, but mo
by pannSun 4y ago
That the terms were agreed to and the sabotage (sorry, anti-tampering) premeditated does not make this non-malicious. A contract may shield them legally, but morally makes their actions no less vile.
- kube-system 4y agoWe’re talking about “malice” in the legal sense, because it is a legal requirement for the above claim of “vandalism” Malice in the terms of establishing mens era is purely dependent on what Cisco thinks about this feature, not what anyone else thinks about it.