Mozilla's engineers are enthusiastic about JPEG XL, but their directors less so. Mozilla's director a year ago: "I'm locking this conversation as it has passed

Mozilla's engineers are enthusiastic about JPEG XL, but their directors less so. Mozilla's director a year ago: "I'm locking this conversation as it has passed the new information stage." This is not a great position, as loads of new information about human rater studies has been obtained, the codecs have advanced further significantly, the ecosystems are developing, industry is developing their stance, and even new objective metrics to evaluate codecs have been developed. I'd like to highlight two things there: My arguments for JPEG XL: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/522#issuecomment-853919129 https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/522#is... -- it comes with links to 3rd party evidence of the somewhat outrageous but correct claims. Jon's arguments for JPEG XL: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/522#issuecomment-943093934 https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/522#is...