4 ms·
Beginning May 3, 2023, U.S. travelers flying within US will need 'RealID'
- whatthesmack 4y agoThat's what they said for the last five (or something) deadlines...
- bluehorseray 4y agoHmm this sees pretty prohibitive for a lot of people. Hope it gets delayed again
- more_corn 4y agoReal ID is racist. It specifically prohibits people who can’t prove citizenship from traveling. It provides zero improved security and moves our country towards restrictive racist practices. I can’t believe it’s not more vigorously opposed.
- amir734jj 4y agoState issued ID card is not enough anymore for domestic flights because it's pretty easy to clone/copy (just google it ...). Not sure why you are trying to tie it to racism.
- hakfoo 4y agoPart of the problem IMO is that there are too many designs in circulation. Even once we filter to "Real ID compliant documents", we have 50 states + a grab bag of territories, each issuing at least a driver's license and a non-driver's identity card, possibly other variants (different formats for under-21, learner's permits, etc.), along with military and tribal issue documents. Now assume each of these will be redesigned every few years, whether it's changing the governor's signature or a full restructuring of the security features. I could see the number of valid documents-- for citizens and permanent residents alone-- easily approaching 1000 types. There's going to be confusion and people are going to be either unfairly hassled for having a unfamiliar but valid document, let through with bogus documents, or both. If you're a TSA agent in Maine, will you correctly recognize a two-generations-old-but-still-valid identity card issued by New Mexico on the spot? What we need is the full-on Mark of the Beast nightmare of having a federal Department of Identity. One standard document, with only a few designs in circulation. States can attach endorsements to the card number for things like driver licensing. Hell, if it's a smart card, they could probably store a signed certificate on the card itself to appease the crypto nerds.
- dane-pgp 4y ago> What we need is the full-on Mark of the Beast nightmare of having a federal Department of Identity. Why stop at federal when you can go global? The question is, will Apple's digital driver's license / state ID support[0] be considered Real ID-compliant, and will this form the basis of a global identity standard? [0] https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/03/apple-launches-the-first-drivers-license-and-state-id-in-wallet-with-arizona/ https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/03/apple-launches-the-fi...
- hakfoo 4y agoI'd prefer it be government infrastructure myself. Insert UN-as-world-government conspiracy theories here if you want, but probably even nation-state is enough for that crowd. If nothing else, a government-backed plan will have armies of stakeholders coming out of the woodwork with a lot of very relevant "...and how does this work after a hurricane causes a week-long power outage and there's nothing resembling a cell tower standing in 100km?" questions. For something like identity, you want a maximally-passive device, probably close to today's current smart and contactless cards, that relies on external readers for any sort of display and interactively. The goal needs to be physical durability-- you don't want someone wading through flood waters, only to find out their iDentity device shorted out in their pocket, or replacing devices that get bent if someone does bends over with it in their pocket, or develop Spicy Pillow Syndrome after 3 years. Does Apple even know how to handle this sort of really minimal design? Didn't their credit card actually physically break down if you put it in a jeans pocket? TBH, that's the sort of thing government is INTENDED for: it's not supposed to be sexy and innovative (and inevitably doomed to sharding into squabbling competitive fiefdoms), it's supposed to be a boring, universally available background service that lets people do other, more interesting things on top of it.
- listenallyall 4y agoWith all due respect, why does anyone need to know where you are traveling? Do the authorities need to know if you have explosives in your bag? Sure. But honestly, what's with showing ID to enter an airport, or to fly domestically?
- TedDoesntTalk 4y agoI can think of several reasons: wanted persons fleeing arrest, kidnapping of a child from another parent, guilt by association (you visited Xxxx when the neo Nazi convention was in session?)
- listenallyall 4y agoNo, these aren't valid reasons. The fact that a person wants to go visit their relatives (by plane only, not by bus, car or train), or take a vacation, or a business trip, doesn't qualify them as a potential kidnapper or criminal.
- Rimintil 4y agoStates like Washington will issue drivers licenses to illegal aliens. The Federal government doesn't like this. But it's in everyone's interest that people get licensed, legal status or otherwise.
- MandieD 4y agoThe conflation of “document proving one is a citizen, or at least a legal resident” and “document proving one has a basic grasp of traffic safety” is unfortunate and not a must. These are separate functions in many countries.
- Vaderv 4y ago
- systemicdanna 4y agoAccording to this definition everything that requires a passport is racist. We need to agree on some very basic level of how we participate in a society, not to give up because a few people can't prove their citizenship. Instead of focusing on criticizing the new document type that is presumably much harder to forge, let's focus on how people can prove their citizenship.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- o0-0o 4y agoPeople without a real id that want to travel will get a real id, and by the way, this is not a requirement. You don't even NEED an ID to fly. Try in one time. Just tell them you don't have an ID with you, and they will take you into a room, and call up a phone number and ask you some questions about yourself. They know everything about you. If you answer correctly, and aren't on any lists, you'll be able to fly just fine. You won't, though, be able to go to the bar after this and have a shot of whisky. You'll definitely need an ID for that. So have your ID ready, just tell the screeners you don't have one.
- ajvs 4y agoWhat does race have to do with proving citizenship?
- ratg13 4y ago"American" is not a race. Either you need a dictionary or a reality check.
- silverwasthere 4y agoFuck this.
- tapatio 4y agoNot true, a passport will work as well.
- pdappollonio 4y agoIf you read the article, it does state that a passport does carry a "RealID", so yes, passports are one form of it.
- aestetix 4y agoMaking sure everyone sees this: https://papersplease.org/wp/ https://papersplease.org/wp/ As far as I'm aware, the public has still never gotten a reasonable answer as to through what legal authority the TSA demands this. Yet another loss of liberty thanks to the godforsaken "PATRIOT" Act.
- yucky 4y agoSo if it's racist to demand ID for voting, is not also racist to demand a RealID for flying?
- dane-pgp 4y agoThere is quite a bright line between "needing to spend a significant amount of money to be allowed to fly somewhere" and "needing to spend a significant amount of money to be allowed to vote". In case you hadn't noticed, there are places in the US where the process of applying for and receiving a government-approved ID is much harder (in terms of time and money) for some groups of people than for others, and (not coincidentally) the groups most likely to be disproportionately burdened are the groups who are more likely to vote for the party in opposition to the one that introduced these rules.
- yucky 4y agoAnywhere that ID is required to vote offers free options for ID. That is by law, due to poll tax restrictions, so what you're saying is not true. Also, in states that require voter ID there are no "groups" who are under-represented, so the idea that it prevents people from voting is demonstrably false.
- dane-pgp 4y agoI think you're underestimating the ingenuity of the restrictions that can be put in place. By making the ID require a long journey (by car), and spending hours waiting in a line, it can cause people to miss a day of work or education (whereas retirees aren't as impacted). Also, assuming people can skip this onerous process if they have a driver's license, that means that people who can't afford a car are more affected by this requirement. You might think that everyone in America owns a car, or at least has access to one they can drive, but only "61 percent of 18-year-olds in the U.S. had a driver’s license in 2018".[0] A similar bias can be found in states which accept gun licenses but not state student ID cards as valid for voting. If you really think there are no groups who are under-represented in these states, you should really provide some statistics on voter turnout for different age groups and demographics. Do you really think that homeless people are as likely to have a valid form of ID as people who own a million dollar home? [0] https://www.statista.com/chart/18682/percentage-of-the-us-population-holding-a-drivers-license-by-age-group/ https://www.statista.com/chart/18682/percentage-of-the-us-po...