3 ms·
People think it’s even remotely close to Fedora because it was initially communicated as an upstream, rolling distro (which Fedora isn’t, anyway, so …), and the
by j33zusjuice 4y ago
People think it’s even remotely close to Fedora because it was initially communicated as an upstream, rolling distro (which Fedora isn’t, anyway, so …), and they never read any of the press or forum posts after day one.
Even if Stream had versions, it’s still only tracking about a minor release ahead of RHEL. If you trusted RHEL’s QE process before, there’s little reason to stop trusting it. I really don’t think much has changed in terms of usage outside of some infrequently used software, but you have to account for that when managing them on a RHEL system, too, so I still don’t really understand the problem.
- rbanffy 4y agoAlso, Red Hat is aware CentOS is their marketing tool. If you like CentOS a lot and need serious support, you hire Red Hat.