3 ms·
Thanks for updating it, but, my comment was less about the title and more about the article which uses the 13% but fails to mention how they calculate this and
by AdamJacobMuller 4y ago
Thanks for updating it, but, my comment was less about the title and more about the article which uses the 13% but fails to mention how they calculate this and I (pessimistically) think it's intentional because if you do a better calculation the number is probably more like 1% and 1% sounds a lot less scary than 13%.
Also, I feel special now that you replied to one of my comments, thanks for all your work to keep HN a civilized place :)