23 ms·
I don’t necessarily agree with Sacks, but most discussion of 230 is just braying nonsense. This one is at least worth discussing.
by pchristensen 4y ago
I don’t necessarily agree with Sacks, but most discussion of 230 is just braying nonsense. This one is at least worth discussing.
- tptacek 4y agoI disagree, for reasons I've given all across the thread. His "incitement" stuff is fatally broken. His "fighting words" stuff is fatally broken. His "defamation" stuff presumes prior restraint for defamation. It's a mess.