I'm no fan of Facebook but this seems like a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't" and/or looking for something to complain about. If they didn't fund

I'm no fan of Facebook but this seems like a case of "damned if you do, damned if you don't" and/or looking for something to complain about. If they didn't fund/build their own cables, these same people would be griping that they're using more than their fair share of available bandwidth. Facebook has a bunch of bits that need to be sent, so they're paying for the infrastructure to send them. What's the problem?