4 ms·
> That is self-proving as false and does not follow automatically what-so-ever. To the extent that anyone believes free markets are good, the usual argument of
by metacritic12 4y ago
> That is self-proving as false and does not follow automatically what-so-ever.
To the extent that anyone believes free markets are good, the usual argument of their goodness does not at all rely on sub-levels to be free markets. Now you might be saying even "free markets are good" is suspect. Attacking that axiom is fine in my book.
> The US has very heavily utilized things like tariffs and restrictive trade agreements throughout its history,
I support this view. However, the early 90s "Washington Consensus" was that in international spheres to talk up how good free markets are. The US should drop that pretense entirely then.