> the vast majority of people on the planet wouldn't bother using twitter even if it was free. "wouldn't bother" should be "don't bother". For the world, arou

> the vast majority of people on the planet wouldn't bother using twitter even if it was free. "wouldn't bother" should be "don't bother". For the world, around 290 million [1], with an internet population of around 4 billion [2], that's around 7%. Things are a bit better for the us, with 41.5 million active users [1], assuming they're all over 18 (209 million), that's about 20% of US population. 1. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2022/10/25/twitter-hemorrhaging-its-most-active-users-report-says/?sh=494433726e5e https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2022/10/25/twit... 2. https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=number+of+adults+with+internet+worldwide&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=number+...