3 ms·
You're right. Go is simpler, cleaner, and lower level. But as with anything, when you have the experience even the linked-to code is second nature and not an
by kcartlidge 4y ago
You're right. Go is simpler, cleaner, and lower level.
But as with anything, when you have the experience even the linked-to code is second nature and not an issue - it's boilerplate, yes, but it is simple stuff that is both obvious and clear to those within the ecosystem and simply represents a different approach.
Personally whilst I use Go daily I think Linq in C# is far superior to anything in Go, but it doesn't stop me using Go as well as C# because each has its own approach and each is a better fit for specific needs.
- tracker1 4y agoFunny, I use the fluent extensions from System.Linq a lot, but almost never use actual LINQ syntax.
- kcartlidge 4y agoYeah, sorry, that's what I meant - Linq in proper-case not caps. Another of Microsoft's annoying naming decisions.