3 ms·
It's also a statistical trick because so few people die before 64 (even more so for e.g. 49). This table [1] shows that someone who makes it to 20 only has a 2
by metacritic12 4y ago
It's also a statistical trick because so few people die before 64 (even more so for e.g. 49). This table [1] shows that someone who makes it to 20 only has a 2% chance of dying before 64. This means eliminating that 1/8 of deaths due to alcohol probably only results in something like 0.1 QALY.
The alcohol result is a corollary of the fact that people who die between ages 20-50 usually die in graphic accidents versus "natural causes" like heart attack, stroke, that are actually the unconditional largest causes of death.
[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/241572/death-rate-by-age-and-sex-in-the-us/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/241572/death-rate-by-age...
- xapata 4y agoThe magnitude is interesting as well, tis true. However, I wouldn't say it's a statistical "trick" because that implies the ratio is not useful information.
- paulryanrogers 4y agoStill a useful trick where the goal is to understand unnecessary death.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]