3 ms·
I always thought that a contribution that lingers in limbo (a great phrase!) has effectively been rejected. I agree that active projects that habitually ignore
by bluenose69 4y ago
I always thought that a contribution that lingers in limbo (a great phrase!) has effectively been rejected.
I agree that active projects that habitually ignore useful contributions for unreasonable time intervals risk losing favour in the open-source community. But whether Go falls into this category is beyond my ken.