> John Carmack considers him a true engineer. Cool. Then he should be an engineer. But he's not. He's a CEO. Ostensibly. And--and I really shouldn't have

> John Carmack considers him a true engineer. Cool. Then he should be an engineer. But he's not. He's a CEO. Ostensibly. And--and I really shouldn't have to say this--those are not the same job. So even if I buy that Musk is a "true engineer" (which I don't, by the way), that doesn't make him de facto a good CEO. In fact, it could just as easily be a liability.