> you haven't provided any of the relevant facts or sources to back this claim It should be pretty clear that no sources are needed beyond using your eyes and

> you haven't provided any of the relevant facts or sources to back this claim It should be pretty clear that no sources are needed beyond using your eyes and looking at Robotbeat's comment - unless it's been edited, then it's rather obvious that no sources were provided, which was the claim being made. Saying "what are your sources" without further elaboration is typically a little rude and combative, but this kind of "no you" comment is flat-out ridiculous.