3 ms·
I agree on your first point, it is the amount of light coming in through the aperture. A wide open aperture lets more light in. The point is just that they hav
by appletrotter 4y ago
I agree on your first point, it is the amount of light coming in through the aperture. A wide open aperture lets more light in.
The point is just that they have to balance DOF and brightness in their designs. It’s a multi-variable equation, and sensor size is one of the factors that constrains the options you have available all things considered.
Like you said
> once you fix the angle of view.
And of course they’re limited to relatively small apertures anyway.
> Because films with higher ISOs are unacceptably grainy for most uses.
Not in my experience! This is just nitpicking now.
We can keep getting more and more technical, but I think you understand how it works.
You’ve made your point. You don’t like gatekeeping. I’m not gatekeeping.
- foldr 4y agoSorry, there’s something about discussions of the relative merits of camera systems that seems to get everyone very hot under the collar. Indeed, I think we have both made our points based on our own experience.