3 ms·
In case of a car, the thrown object is the easy case. Now imagine you spot a person walking down the road on a pavement. Suddenly, the person turns towards the
by AstralStorm 4y ago
In case of a car, the thrown object is the easy case.
Now imagine you spot a person walking down the road on a pavement. Suddenly, the person turns towards the edge. What do you do?
See, a human driver would look at the gait of the person from far away to evaluate for instance if they're sober, or if it's a child who might be expected to run in. Whether it is near a crossing or a potential crossing. Whether the person was walking or standing... Many other obvious and less obvious indicators.
AI currently sees a moving blob of pixels in a shape of a person. No advanced inference.
When interviewed in case of an accident, say because they got rear ended due to braking, a person can explain why they braked most of the time.
AI now couldn't even say which features it weighted.
- williamcotton 4y agoI agree! My pet theory is that we'll need supervised training of androids that go through the experience of having to learn how to move their human-like bodies through space in order to make human-like intelligent decisions about objects moving through spaces primarily designed for humans. My other historically motivated pet theory is that we're going to stumble across sentient machines and then enslave them. Put another way, I'm more worried about what humans do to artificial sentient life than what artificial sentient life does to humans.