> You take a bunch of tensors No, radically not. That is not the kind of understanding we seek. The advance in knowledge is given by, e.g., "simulated anneali

> You take a bunch of tensors No, radically not. That is not the kind of understanding we seek. The advance in knowledge is given by, e.g., "simulated annealing returned a blueprint for very odd circuit schematic with No-Op loops: we were puzzled but then understood they were there to correct timing". And this is not the level of explanation where tensors are.