2 ms·
It's hardly comparable. The excavator does not owe its creative influence to the hole diggers. The quality of its work does not result from someone else's intel
by nicbou 4y ago
It's hardly comparable. The excavator does not owe its creative influence to the hole diggers. The quality of its work does not result from someone else's intellectual labor. It's 100% the digger doing the digging.
- UweSchmidt 4y agoIt's technology putting people out of work. We care a lot about Copilot, we care somewhat about artists, we care little about manual workers, and less so if they are in another country.
- nicbou 4y agoNot quite. It still relies on their inputs. It doesn't just put them out of work, it feeds off them. I'm not sure of what I'd call this relationship, but parasitic is close to it.
- Siira 4y agoIt’s a teacher-student relationship, except the teachers don’t do anything specifically for the students. Let our jobs be taken by Copilot. Are you that afraid?
- themanmaran 4y ago> The excavator does not owe its creative influence to the hole diggers But it does. While not as complex as AI art generation, the excavator is mimicking the hole digger. It takes a human action, generalizes it, and offers it in a more efficient manner.