I'm trying to understand. The impact reported by the study seems to compound with higher amounts (I would imagine as liver and kidney throughput is exceeded and

I'm trying to understand. The impact reported by the study seems to compound with higher amounts (I would imagine as liver and kidney throughput is exceeded and the poison hits you more directly). Standard Control: GMV WMV 0–1 AU −0.030 −0.020 1–2 AU −0.127 −0.074 2–3 AU −0.223 −0.129 So cumulatively, 0-3 drinks is is GMV: -0.380, WMV: -0.223 What I don't know and can't seem to find with a quick search is the conversion method for IDP standard deviations in brain matter relate to absolute percentages of brain matter (which I assume is not linear?). If your comment is correct, then these numbers correlate to an absolute reduction of 2% of brain matter? I also see that the third drink seems to do about 50% more standard deviation movement than the former 2 put together. EDIT: Never mind it's been a while since I took statistics, I remembered that standard deviations _are_ a linear amount. I'd been thinking of percentile placement on a normal distribution.