6 ms·
I disagree with none of your principles except the one that apparently says legal intervention is necessary. The walled gardens are not a secret, people are mak
by nknight 15y ago
I disagree with none of your principles except the one that apparently says legal intervention is necessary. The walled gardens are not a secret, people are making the decision to buy these devices knowing they won't be able to do certain things. They do have other reasonable options.
This isn't fraud, and it's not a hidden problem hard for people to grasp. There's no apparent collusion to block new competitors. If the masses conclude it is intolerable, the companies will stop making money and that's the end of it. If not, it shouldn't be illegal in the first place.
If you're upset about it, well, this is a site targeted at people into startups...
- exit 15y agowhereas i don't trust the masses to arrive at coherent conclusions, much less effectively collude in their own interest. > If the masses conclude it is intolerable, the companies will stop making money and that's the end of it. so companies choose between not making money immediately, or waiting for "the masses" to get an act together and vote with their wallets? ha.
- joebadmo 15y agoDisagreement downvotes... such a shame. I disagree with you, but find your position to be valid and reasonable.