> One is explicitly being reversed, and the other is protection of a vulnerable group regardless of majority status. The “reversed” case is because people don’

> One is explicitly being reversed, and the other is protection of a vulnerable group regardless of majority status. The “reversed” case is because people don’t actually care enough to elect representatives that reflect those views. There is a Democratic majority house, senate, and president. Why isn’t abortion protected? > and the other is protection of a vulnerable group regardless of majority status It’s protected because the majority decided to protect it. The majority could easily remove that protection. They aren’t constitutionally protected.