I agree completely about OIDC's discovery limitations! If this standard can improve along that axis, then that alone will make it a valuable contribution to the

I agree completely about OIDC's discovery limitations! If this standard can improve along that axis, then that alone will make it a valuable contribution to the identity space. I also agree about standardized claim names, although I'll point out that standardizing something like `phone_verified` just pushed the identity/claim value question one level deeper: what does it mean for IdP A to have `phone_verified` versus IdP B? Do they have the same ontological value? That's part of why (IMO) "generalized" identity management has never succeeded: you can make everybody generate the same claims, but you can't assert that they've done a uniform or sufficient degree of diligence for those claims. The only way you can do the latter is to select "high quality" IdPs, at which point the consistency of the claim names no longer matters.