3 ms·
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/71500/why-wasnt-the-737-maxs-landing-gear-lengthened-enough-to-mount-the-engines-und https://aviation.stackexchange
by andrewia 4y ago
https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/71500/why-wasnt-the-737-maxs-landing-gear-lengthened-enough-to-mount-the-engines-und https://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/71500/why-wasnt...
TL;DR that adds engineering complexity and/or would trigger redesigns of other components. The MAX 8 was supposed to be an economical refresh - a stopgap until the Y1/"New Midsize Airplane" was ready. (The sales/economic failure of the Y1 "787 Dreamliner" means the Y1 project is paused while Boeing waits for next generation technology to become available. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Yellowstone_Project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_Yellowstone_Project )
- theYipster 4y agoThe economic troubles of the 787 have nothing to do with the technology applied. It’s due to how Boeing managed the program. The A350 employs the same technology and is an economic success.
- fmajid 4y agoHere's a scathing paper by a Boeing engineer on how the Dreamliner project's emphasis on outsourcing was an utter fiasco: https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/ziggyworks/coolstuff/BoeingOutsourcing-2014130646.pdf https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/ziggyworks/coolstuff/Boei...