>> Are there rules or policy written down about what can/cannot be said that the institution enforces that goes against what the public leader wanted? Well, I

>> Are there rules or policy written down about what can/cannot be said that the institution enforces that goes against what the public leader wanted? Well, I can't give an answer from a legal point of view, because I'm looking for it myself. But in various instances of life we see the requirement of formality between authorities and the public. In fact, all public interaction with the state is formal. Here's a problem: the state has a set of international commitments, but the head of that state makes personal statements that go against the very official line of the government he leads [the case of Bolsonaro in Brazil]. Catalyzed by the dynamics of the network This quickly turns into another front of disinformation. The public is completely at the mercy of the machinations of the powerful entity. I don't think there is anything in the Republican rules that precludes proper legislation on this subject.