4 ms·
In my understanding it would be hard to make the case that Rust actually has more undefined behavior than C -- most kinds of undefined behavior in C have been c
by dochtman 4y ago
In my understanding it would be hard to make the case that Rust actually has more undefined behavior than C -- most kinds of undefined behavior in C have been carefully avoided in Rust, although, yes, there is no piece of paper ratified by a bunch of national technology institutes that describes Rust.
See also this recent blog post:
https://blog.m-ou.se/rust-standard/ https://blog.m-ou.se/rust-standard/
- anonym29 4y agoWhile the rust community might not believe their language needs a specification, some of their would-be customers have business requirements surrounding a specification that cannot be fulfilled with a reference. edit: clarity
- dochtman 4y agoA standard or a specification? Anyway, hopefully Ferrocene will be able to provide those folks what they need. https://ferrous-systems.com/ferrocene/ https://ferrous-systems.com/ferrocene/
- anonym29 4y agoThank you for catching this mistake on my part, fixed.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- pcwalton 4y agoCan you explain what the difference is between a standard and a reference?
- anonym29 4y agoSee edit