4 ms·
I think an audit trail of a government is very different from being able to pick through the personal posts of an individual person. I think it'd actually be a
by delecti 4y ago
I think an audit trail of a government is very different from being able to pick through the personal posts of an individual person. I think it'd actually be a fantastic feature to have history gently fade away. If I could disable other people viewing my tweets older than 1 year, I'd enable it in a heartbeat, and I'd think nearly everyone else should too.
- mbreese 4y agoI think the right to be forgotten is one of the worst things we've lost in the modern Internet era. People should be allowed to say/do something stupid when they are young without it coming back to bite them when they are older. Within reason -- for example: pictures from college parties. There's no reason why these should be forever accessible. A nice, graceful decay on some data would make sense.
- mdp2021 4y ago> something stupid I would say a good example of "something stupid" would be to publish something that should remain private.
- mdp2021 4y agoAnd I would add: when exactly did the term 'prudence' fall from top positions to quasi-neglection in the ranking of frequency of use, and instead others like 'paranoia' started to climb?
- mbreese 4y agoIt's different now though... "publish" means much more than it used to. Now, if you want to share a picture with a few friends, that means "publishing" it on Facebook/IG/etc... It's no longer just a physical photo that is controlled by you. By moving personal interactions online, you lose a lot of control and things that used to be temporary are now permanent. I don't think that it's possible to put this genie back in the bottle, so the next best thing would be to have different levels of data permanence.
- mdp2021 4y ago> By moving personal interactions online And by saying that, do not you get a vibe that makes you go "Wait a minute there...". > different levels of data permanence It makes more sense to discriminate "personal common spaces" and "The Public Statements of Sam Artist / of Noam Thinker / of Henry Statesman / of Theodor Ruler".
- mdp2021 4y agoIf what you write should better at some point disappear, you should not write it in the first place. This, of course, in the collector with the purpose I am imagining - the replying poster clearly wants to visit a very different place. In the restaurant you get "restored" through proper treatment, while at the bar the idea is to get disturbed through every device: restaurants shall not be bars. When I, in the distant past, thought about checking T., it was because some specific great minds had approached it: I checked it on the idea to consult the statements from specific prestigious Intellectuals - not random posts. And: the replying poster has not provided a speckle of a justification for the "bohemian" idea proposed. > an audit trail of a government is very different The platform that the submitter proposed for discussion reportedly has an extraordinary participation of leaders, ministers, politicians and official speakers. So, while my original statement was a parallel in an absiological context ("if something important was submitted it has to be retrievable"), even a direct more literal application of the idea is possible.
- Kye 4y agoMastodon has a built-in post culler for this purpose.