3 ms·
I understand what you're saying and as I've just realised in another reply, I wasn't really that clear. Linux the kernel is widely adopted and a huge sucess.
by muppetman 15y ago
I understand what you're saying and as I've just realised in another reply, I wasn't really that clear. Linux the kernel is widely adopted and a huge sucess.
But the GUI aspect, the bit the user actually interacts with, isn't. There's so many choices. A vendor can't just built a single binary easily like they can for Windows/MacOS.
It's this, the fragmentation of the user-space that's my concern. WebOS is built on Linux anyway, that'll never be a problem.
You can "can simply get Ubuntu and not worry about it". I know that, you know that, most technical people know that. I guess it's not too hard for most non-technical people to figure that out, but look at Linux Mint. It's suddenly taking off in a big way. How do I know which one to pick? Which one is going to run the apps I need etc? It's that - the confusion - that I worry might also happen to WebOS if 10 different builds are released.
- kermitthehermit 15y agoThe vendor's troubles with shipping hardware with Linux don't lie in "extreme fragmentation" or "hard to decide which distribution / software stack to sell the hardware with". Just so you don't think about it again: it's mostly Microsoft blackmailing people into not selling ANYTHING but Windows on the hardware. If you think that's not true, you should really think of the time when ASUS was selling netbooks with Linux. I recall reading a lot of stories about vendors being blackmailed by Microsoft - stop selling hardware with Linux or you will not receive any more rights to sell your hardware with Windows.