3 ms·
I note that ARM disputes these claims: https://www.fierceelectronics.com/sensors/arm-qualcomm-legal-battle-suggests-oems-need-arm-ip-licenses-not-chip-firms ht
by pabs3 4y ago
I note that ARM disputes these claims:
https://www.fierceelectronics.com/sensors/arm-qualcomm-legal-battle-suggests-oems-need-arm-ip-licenses-not-chip-firms https://www.fierceelectronics.com/sensors/arm-qualcomm-legal...
- UltraViolence 4y agoThat sounds like Russia denying they were about to invade Ukraine until they did.
- WastingMyTime89 4y agoIt sounds more like Qualcomm making preposterous claims to avoid having people looking closely as what’s happening with the Nuvia IP. It seems to be working. That would be classic Qualcomm. As a rule, when Qualcomm disagree with another company, you can assume they are in the wrong.
- klelatti 4y agoIt's interesting that apparently Qualcomm didn't inform Arm of the Nuvia purchase even though there was a change of control clause in Nuvia's license. Also IIRC they had 30+ comments from other firms endorsing the purchase ready in advance so basically told everyone but Arm. Make of that what you will!
- CameronNemo 4y agoHave any other SoC vendors come forward on either side of the matter? I don't put it past a pre-IPO ARM to do something like this to make their numbers look better. But I also don't trust Qualcomm to be entirely truthful.