2 ms·
> But I don't see them banning anyone from speaking. [1] disagrees. [2] disagrees. [3] disagrees. etc.etc. [1] https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/heres
by zimpenfish 4y ago
> But I don't see them banning anyone from speaking.
[1] disagrees. [2] disagrees. [3] disagrees. etc.etc.
[1] https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/heres-the-long-list-of-topics-republicans-want-banned-from-the-classroom/2022/02 https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/heres-the-long-list-o...
[2] https://jezebel.com/republicans-are-trying-to-ban-speech-about-abortion-pil-1849343362 https://jezebel.com/republicans-are-trying-to-ban-speech-abo...
[3] https://truthout.org/articles/gops-banning-of-books-and-attack-on-teachers-expose-the-partys-rising-fascism/ https://truthout.org/articles/gops-banning-of-books-and-atta...
- verisimi 4y agoWanting to ban something is different to actually banning people from speaking. But, no doubt, there are republicans who would do this too. I would say the exact same thing to them, as and when they start actually banning something or someone. Freedom of speech is not a political position; try not to drag me into the gutter, please!