3 ms·
Needs a (2014) tag. Also, I am baffled that this is apparently a Nature publication, sounds more like an op-ed for a newspaper. What was the research result th
by c7b 4y ago
Needs a (2014) tag.
Also, I am baffled that this is apparently a Nature publication, sounds more like an op-ed for a newspaper. What was the research result that was communicated in the article? It's barely exhaustive enough to count as a literature review.
- MagnumOpus 4y agoIt's a "comment" for Nature, not a journal article. They are basically the op-eds of the journal, along with "correspondence" and "column" pieces, as far as I understand - and very much not held to the same standards as the journal articles.