3 ms·
But there certainly were Scandinavian explorers, conquerors, and mercenaries. And these pushed into non-Scandinavian territories across Europe in a way that re
by enkid 4y ago
But there certainly were Scandinavian explorers, conquerors, and mercenaries. And these pushed into non-Scandinavian territories across Europe in a way that reshaped the political landscape at the time. For example, the Normans set up kingdoms in England, France, and even Sicily, and were an important player in Byzantine politics. Other Scandinavian conquerors helped establish dynasties in Ukraine and the area around the Black Sea. I'm not saying it wasn't complex, but there does seem that there was genuine phenomenon of Scandinavian raids and conquest in the late first millennium separate from the expected local raids between neighboring peoples.
- acjohnson55 4y agoIt's a bit of a stretch to lump all of that in with the term Viking, though. I think the actual settlement and conquest is a different phenomenon. Like, I wouldn't consider the Normans Vikings. When people think of the Viking age, it's more of the phenomenon of groups of men going on expeditions from Scandinavia to make amphibious assaults on soft targets. Most of the men who did this did a couple big scores and returned to village life back home. This transformed into settlement, adoption of Christianity, and then the carving out of the niches you identified. The Magyars had a similar arc. The Arabs, too, except that their raiding ended up steamrolling through the ailing Roman and Sassanian empires, leading to their own intercontinental empire and religion, rather than settling into existing systems.