4 ms·
I suspect it's more to get rid of something. I can't imagine that all the oil, lubricants, fuel-residues, breakdown products and so on are any good for marine
by MrVandemar 4y ago
I suspect it's more to get rid of something.
I can't imagine that all the oil, lubricants, fuel-residues, breakdown products and so on are any good for marine life at all.
The "for marine habitat" sounds like marketing.
- mc32 4y agoI’m not too sure about that. The NYC drops their old subway cars into the bay. So it depends on how the ships or vehicles are disposed: https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/earthisblue/wk208-shipwrecks-habitat-feature.html https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/earthisblue/wk208-shipwrecks-ha... The main concern being ship cargo and any potential for contaminants exceeding toxicity levels.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- whydat_whodat 4y agoNo offense, but to me I interpret your perspective as: "People with stuff to get rid of tell me its good to dump it in the ocean. They said it's a good thing, so I take their word for it without critically analyzing its actual environmental impact-- plastics, metals, chemicals used in subway cars or vehicles... hey, they said it's ok, so it must be ok!" I ain't buying it :D But then again I am an environmentalist & conservationist-- I am concerned about the apparently infinitely growing ubiquity of synthetic chemicals, due to aforementioned actions mentioned and the apparently common lack of objection (if people are even aware it is happening).