3 ms·
In the original code, actually, no, incrementing "to" was not desired. The "to" was pointing to a hardware memory-mapped register, and it needed to copy to the
by jcranmer 4y ago
In the original code, actually, no, incrementing "to" was not desired. The "to" was pointing to a hardware memory-mapped register, and it needed to copy to the same memory location each time.
- fractalb 4y agoDidn’t know that. Thanks