3 ms·
It's not about preventing people from knowing anything about my life. It's about control and threat surface. You can do these things without thinking after a li
by Test0129 4y ago
It's not about preventing people from knowing anything about my life. It's about control and threat surface. You can do these things without thinking after a little practice. I would like to present the version of myself I want the public to know about and have full control over that. Incursions into my privacy violate that idea.
It's not paranoia. That would imply they aren't out to get you. They are. Leave the government out of it for a second. If someone's phone is stolen it's very likely their entire identity, a majority of their secrets, documents like medical ID cards, credit cards, etc have been compromised. This is akin to "getting a warrant to a safe" (which in reality is just court-ordered theft) and it will completely destroy a person. In the context of the discussion if you were able to break into a dead person's phone you could very likely build a complete picture of their life. Perhaps one they weren't interested in you knowing about.
I'd prefer to avoid those situations. First, by not making myself a target, and second by protecting any and all data I have the best I can. I rarely think about it but I know if my phone is stolen, my computers are taken, or I get caught up in a fishing expedition the threat surface is extremely limited (provided the information isn't beaten out of me).
- Godel_unicode 4y agoYou have chosen to have a different risk tolerance than the person you’re replying to. They explained their threat model, you disagree. That doesn’t make you right or them wrong. It’s simultaneously true that for your model they’re being naive and for theirs you’re being paranoid. That’s fine.
- the-anarchist 4y agoWell said, good sir!