3 ms·
Tried Arc, not my thing. Personally I want browsers to be developer originated, support massive amounts of protocols and playback formats, span over multiple la
by est 4y ago
Tried Arc, not my thing. Personally I want browsers to be developer originated, support massive amounts of protocols and playback formats, span over multiple layers of networks, debug tech stack issues as it should be. I don't bother tabs or bookmarks as I always choose to remember URLs with my head.
I am not against content creativity, but I really hope someone can re-invent Shockwave Flash, a container for streamable vector animation format. SVG and DOM canvas stuff are traumatic to work with and they always seem to burn my cpu0. Rich media should be so much richer & quicker instead of 20MB main.min.js barely movable <div> renders like shit on a browser. We had better content experience with .swf players on a Pentium-III.
Players should entertain us, they should be designed as consumer-oriented software. But browsers are for productivity, they were supposed to browse a broad range of documents hosted on networks of variety, with absolute control and input.
Now the world is confusing these two, we are browsing a world of popups, paywalls and infinite scrolls. Arc might never be able to solve the problem here.