So someone who uses land very inefficiently and thus gets very little value out of the land should have it for close to free, whereas someone who would use it e

So someone who uses land very inefficiently and thus gets very little value out of the land should have it for close to free, whereas someone who would use it efficiently and thus derive lots of value from it should have to pay large sums to keep using it that way? Seems like a perverse incentive to me.