4 ms·
That's an interesting theorey. If it's correct that could explain it. But, I just checked the demographics in Massachusets in the 1800s and it shows that ther
by throw8383833jj 4y ago
That's an interesting theorey. If it's correct that could explain it.
But, I just checked the demographics in Massachusets in the 1800s and it shows that there were 0 slaves. And it looks like minorities were in very very small numbers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1800_United_States_census https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1800_United_States_census
I don't think the labor supply of oppressed minorities was influential enough to drive down the cost of labor. Yes, for railroads sure but not for construction of buildings.
- kaz-inc 4y agoOppression is not localized. A country or company that profits from plantations can reap the benefits from far away. As a simple example, think of sugar plantations in the Caribbean being exploited by men across the ocean.
- azinman2 4y agoIs it really all that different then from buying products locally where labor is cheap?