3 ms·
> No, thanks. Not sure from which perspective you're saying "No" from? If you were a Twitter employee, that means quitting. But apparently from what you just
by hnfong 4y ago
> No, thanks.
Not sure from which perspective you're saying "No" from?
If you were a Twitter employee, that means quitting. But apparently from what you just said you don't want to lose your job. (There's no stress if getting fired is something that doesn't bother you)
Or from a management perspective? In which case I think vincnetas did a good job explaining why management might want to do this if they wanted to downsize.
Basically you're saying the concept of laying off people is a ridiculous viewpoint because it makes employees feel stressed. Sure this is just a discussion forum and we're all free to express opinions, but realistically, what makes you think an employee can say "No, thanks" to this?
- xfallow 4y ago"There's no stress if getting fired is something that doesn't bother you" Sure there is, long painful meetings where you go over your work for the last 30 days sounds miserable regardless of if you care about the outcome. You also might lose your severance package. While you can't say no thanks, if put in that situation by my employer I'd do the bare minimum and start lining up interviews with the tens of recruiters that message me daily (as I'm sure is the case for anyone with twitter on their resume)