3 ms·
Entirely OT, but you did bring it up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Age http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Age. It would be iron age. And no historian d
by rubidium 15y ago
Entirely OT, but you did bring it up.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Age http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bronze_Age. It would be iron age. And no historian disputes that an actual letter was written to Corinthians (and most are certain on Paul), so that takes out the mythology. At best, you can call it "Iron Age history of uncertain veracity". Sorry that it doesn't have quite the same demeaning effect.
- danilocampos 15y agoTouché! Though the contents of said communiques do, indeed, form mythology.